Anti-condom evangelicals had their political way with Bush

Christian evangelicals pushed the Bush administration to an anti-condom position like the one which has called down fire on Pope Benedict XVI's head. They even drove insufficiently anti-condom evangelicals out of the administration. Jamie Kirchick wrote at TNR:

Anne Peterson, an assistant administrator for global health in the U.S. Agency for International Development and an evangelical who had worked with Christian aid groups in Africa, incurred the wrath of Focus on the Family founder James Dobson during a 2004 meeting at his Colorado Springs headquarters. There, Dobson asked Peterson for her position on condoms, to which she replied that they were an essential feature in HIV prevention alongside the encouragement of abstinence and monogamy. Soon after, Focus on the Family issued a paper criticizing her, and she eventually resigned under pressure. Peterson was replaced by Kent Hill, an evangelical Christian activist with neither a medical degree nor public health experience, who is currently the acting administrator of USAID.

Bumper-mounted idolatry

American license-plate worship has recently broken out like the hives, nowhere as intensely as in South Carolina. There, only a temporary federal injunction prevents state sale of cross & stained-glass illustrated "I believe" license plates.

Robert Marsden (Monty) Knight, pastor of First Christian Church in Charleston, S.C. and is one of four clergy plaintiffs in the lawsuit challenging his state’s proposed “I Believe” license plates. He told DisciplesWorld:

It’s just politicians trotting out a shallow veneer of Christian piety to court the Christians here in South Carolina. [The governor didn’t endorse it] He said, in essence, if your faith is no deeper than a license plate, it’s pretty shallow. There are other special plates…but this one came straight from the legislature- it was a violation of the First Amendment from the get-go.

Faith as deep as a license plate, as wide as chrome door trim? Faith politically demeaned by legislators.

Fairness Doctrine Panic among religious broadcasters

National Religious Broadcast Convention attendees showed symptoms of what Matthew Lasar called Fairness Doctrine Panic (FDP) during their Feb. 7-10 convention in Nashville.

Intravenous facts weren't strong enough medicine to prevent the emergence of FDP symptoms.

The broadcasters sponsored a debate between Whitewater investigator Ken Starr, dean of Pepperdine University School of Law, and Nadine Strossen, former president of the American Civil Liberties Union. It concluded that the Fairness Doctrine wasn't coming back.

Last June, then Sen. Barack Obama made clear his opposition to fairness doctrine renewal, and has not budged since.

Acting Federal Communications Commission Chairman Michae Copps recently said that the Fairness Doctrine is an old fight that “didn’t need to be rehashed.”

Even former President Jimmy Carter has spoken against revival of that era-of-limited-outlets artifact. It was a Federal Communications Commission policy requiring broadcasters to air controversial issues of public importance and in a manner that was judged to be honest, equitable, and balanced. One that Carter said properly went away as a part of industry deregulation for which his administration labored.

Some Democratic legislators were provoked last week to make a little noise about it, but there is no legislation in prospect and apparent supporters have since been backing away.

Still, the disease is nurtured by poorly researched news stories from sources which are typically sympathetic to religious broadcasters.

So who can blame the broadcasters for being fearful of potential Obama meddling. But there is nonetheless every reason to believe they're being misled into wasting their time.

And that's no way to treat the broadcasters. They have real survival concerns which require their attention.

Addendum

GetReligion reminds us that the Fairness Doctrine is often confused with the Equal Time Rule. The latter "requires stations that give free air time to one candidate to provide the same service to their opponent."

Religious broadcasters under grinding pressure

Religious broadcasters aren't going postal, like their ecclesiastical print brethren. But they are under similar grinding pressure.

They're squeezed between aging audiences, economy-driven declines in ad revenue and donations and competition from free, Web-based audio and video.

Paul Creasman, associate professor of communications at Southern Wesleyan University in Central, S.C. told the Religion News Service:

The industry is at a crossroads. The audience is dwindling, and they have to figure out what to do. But the Web is not the answer because older audiences don't use the Internet . . . and younger audiences will go to the Web for content, but they'll probably be less likely to donate.

So broadcasters are cutting back, postponing investment and otherwise trying to hold on. the Religion News Service reported:

• Christian radio giant Salem Communications sold four stations, cut 10 percent of its workforce and trimmed 5% off all salaries. Salem’s stock prices still tumbled 74 percent last year to less than $1 per share.
• Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN), the nation’s largest Christian TV network, has laid off workers and scrambled to fill programming holes as T.D. Jakes, Joyce Meyer and other big-name ministries cut costs by producing fewer shows.
• Focus on the Family, which has produced James Dobson’s radio show since 1977, has eliminated about 450 jobs (30 percent of its workforce) since 2004, including 200 job cuts since November.

Content sources have also been drying up, and not just for TBN. Adelle Banks of Religion News Service wrote last month:

. . . fewer megachurches are involved in TV and radio ministry; the percentage of megachurches with a radio ministry dropped from 44 percent in 2000 to 24 percent in 2008. Likewise, the percentage with television ministries dropped from 38 percent to 23 percent.

For years, Christian broadcasters have speculated that part of the future inevitably lay in moving their content online. As with newspapers, the prevailing wisdom is adapt to the digital age or die. And as with print newspaper Web services, online isn't paying current bills.

Otherwise, they're experimenting with formats, launching new online ministries and hoping for enough in donations to keep them afloat.

Again from Religion News Service:

"You don’t find businesses making sacrifices to make sure advertising dollars are paid to broadcasters. That’s not part of their paradigm,” said Craig Parshall, senior vice president of the National Religious Broadcasters, a 1,400-member organization that held its annual convention last weekend (Feb. 7-10) in Nashville.

“But individual families are willing to be sacrificial because of the mission of Christian broadcasting."

Are they? Still? Anyone who has worked at a newspaper until it closed its doors can recall that belief that things would somehow continue as in the past, until they didn't.

Praises Darwin billboard

From the Madison (Wisc.) Capital Times

The Madison-based Freedom From Religion Foundation is unveiling a new billboard in Madison and two other cities to honor Charles Darwin as his 200th birthday approaches.

"Praise Darwin," reads the upper portion of the billboard, in biblical script, while the second line reads, "Evolve Beyond Belief."

The organization also plans to put up billboards in Dayton, Tenn., and Dover, Penn., in time for Darwin's Feb. 12 birthday. Dayton was the site of the infamous 1925 Scopes "Monkey Trial," while Dover is the small Pennsylvania town where an attempt by the local school board to promote "intelligent design" as a competing theory to Darwin's theory of evolution was tossed out by U.S. District Judge John Jones after a trial in 2005 that lasted 40 days and 40 nights.

Read the entire story here.