Whether motivated by sincerely-held Christian beliefs or an effort to purchase political capital with religious coin, the result is the same.
The statute is clearly unconstitutional and defence of its implementation has embroiled the state in unnecessary (and expensive) litigation.
Food Ministry Can Move Ahead with RLUIPA and Free Exercise Claims Against
City
-
In *Gethsemani Baptist Church v. City of San Luis,* (D AZ, Nov. 22, 2024),
an Arizona federal district court refused to dismiss RLUIPA, 1st Amendment
and...
12 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting. Comments are moderated. Yours will be reviewed soon.