An 'ill-informed' blogger's retort

Who are the unnamed, unnumbered ill-informed bloggers referred to amid the Mark Driscoll kerfuffle?

Peter Lumpkins identifies himself as "presumably" one. Then takes down by name and hyperlink several Southern Baptist bloggers who "have stepped into the batter's box" for Driscoll. And who have done so while arguing that they aren't quite on Driscoll's team, because they are "by no means endorsing all he does or believes." Thus it follows:

. . . had those of us who chose to disagree had left the content of the diagreeables innocous, as do the defenders, we'd all just be one, big happy family!