The startling headline says, Activists on the left, right share faith but little else, and although the attendant story says just that, it's wrong.
Just, wrong.
A study sponsored by the Republican-oriented Bliss Institute of Applied Politics involved two, separate, different surveys. the results of which were conflated to produce an outcome which is essentially meaningless.
Here is their description of what they call "Study Design:"
The design of the study proceeded in three steps. First, the authors consulted with scholars, journalists, and leaders of religious organizations to determine the organizations that were central to contemporary religious activism. The study sought to identify organizations that were national in scope, had relatively prominent public profiles, and had large, clean lists of their members/affiliates. This consultation revealed that it made most sense to conduct two separate surveys: one survey of progressive religious activists and another of conservative religious activists. This division also made sense for substantive reasons because somewhat different questions were relevant to progressive and conservative religious activists. More importantly, the consultation produced considerable agreement about the major organizations that fit these criteria and constitute the rival religious activist corps.
Their "study" may have revealed a little about the views of people who are members of the organizations identified by someone as "central to contemporary religious activism."
But Christian activists in general were neither identified nor surveyed.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting. Comments are moderated. Yours will be reviewed soon.